Democrats are getting Colder…

May 9th, 2008 by Scott

The “global warming” activists haven’t been very active recently. Sure, Algore is telling everyone the recent cyclone in Burma was because of global warming.

This is unfortunate, because it contradicts all the REAL scientific data. April was actually the coolest April in 11 years and the 29th coldest April in 114 YEARS! And this is according to NOAA:

The average temperature in April 2008 was 51.0 F. This was -1.0 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average, the 29th coolest April in 114 years.
(Source: NOAA)

So lets go down the list of Democratic talking points:

Iraq - They said it was broken and the surge wouldn’t work. It did work and this talking point was dropped.

Global Warming - We’ve seen a global COOLING trend. This talking point has gone bye-bye.

The Economy - Democrats are hoping for a Recession so they can blame Bush for wrecking the economy. But unemployment fell to 5% last quarter, the GDP has GROWN (a recession needs two consecutive quarters of negative growth… despite Democratic yelling, it has remained in POSITIVE GROWTH).

One final note about the “global warming” crowd. Here’s the deal. Temperatures go up. Then they go down. The Earth is cyclical. Everything happens in cycles. Tides change every 6 hours, seasons change four times a year.

The temperature will go down for a few years, then it will go up again. Its just nature.

Just a Politician

May 2nd, 2008 by Scott

I’m a bit late on this one, but wanted to expand just a little on my post on April 16, about Obama being “just another politician.” I wrote on April 16:

He isn’t the new ‘change’ everyone wants. He is just a politician, just like Clinton, twisting words, distracting and blaming others.

Obama’s paster, Jeremiah Wright, continues to stoke the flames. First, it was his quotes, “God Damn America” days after September 11. Now, he is going after Obama. On April 28, just 12 days AFTER MY ANALYSIS, Wright said:

He’s a politician. And he says what he has to say as a politician. He had to distance himself, because he’s a politician, from what the media was saying I had said, which was anti-American. (Source)

Yup. Obama’s just another politician. In fact, according to Rasmussen Reports, 58% Say Obama Denounced Wright for Political Convenience, not Outrage.

In the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination, it’s Clinton 46% Obama 44%. That’s the second straight day that Clinton has held a statistically insignificant two-point edge over Obama. However, that represents a ten-point swing since Wright’s press conference. Before Wright appeared at the National Press Club, Obama led Clinton by eight points. (Source: Rasmussen Reports)

As I’ve said many times, this is a fun election. *grin*

Funny How Things Change

April 16th, 2008 by Scott

Remember late last year before the election got into full swing (dare I say, back in more innocent times?). Back then, all the Democratics were so thrilled about Obama and Mrs. Bill Clinton. They would get either a woman OR an African American. “How Cool” they were saying. Or even better…. a Clinton/Obama ticket.

Fast forward to today. This Democratic battle has become so bitter (to use the media’s word of the day thanks to Obama and Clinton).

In fact, look at the numbers. According to Rasmussen Reports, 22% of Democrats Want Clinton to Drop Out; 22% Say Obama Should Withdraw (source: Rasmussen Reports).

And even more proof of the anger within their party: If McCain vs. Obama, 28% of Clinton Backers Go for McCain (Source: Gallup)


Source: Gallup

So the Dems don’t want to even support another Democratic candidate. They’d rather vote for MCCAIN instead!!! I just don’t see either one selecting the other for Veep because of this bitter anger.

I’m looking forward to seeing these two in tonight’s debate in Philly. They were even funnier trying to prove how they were each the more religious person at Messiah College in Harrisburg the other day.

I’ll more than likely have some analysis of the debate after it airs tonight.

Meanwhile, as the Democrats claw at each other and tell each other how bitter they are, McCain is the only one describing IN DETAIL, specific ideas for our country, like getting rid of the Federal Gas Tax to help with gas prices.

Love it!

Pep Rally Funeral

April 14th, 2008 by Scott

You just can’t make this stuff up. According to several news reports, Obama’s pastor is at it again. The Rev. Wright made a few comments at a funeral that are in lockstep with his previous remarks. Speaking about the pastor who passed on:

[He] was not the jingoistic, chauvinistic ‘you’re either with us or against us’ demonizing kind of faith.

That was just the beginning of what seemed like a pep rally. Brings back memories of the other Democratic funeral/pep rally for the late Minnesota Senator Paul Wellstone, who died in 2002. Remember the applause, the cheering and the inflammatory remarks at that funeral by all the Democrat speakers and attendees?

Deja vu.

“FOX News can’t understand that,” Wright said to rousing cheers and applause.

Here we go again! This week is going to be all about the funeral / pep rally. Add to the mix Hillary’s comments this past weekend about support for shooting guns.

I’m going to have to buy more popcorn. This is turning into a double-feature!

Bad Boys

March 18th, 2008 by Scott

Remember how the Democrats kept harping about that “Culture of Corruption” during the last election? Why are the Republicans NOT harping about the Democratic Culture of Corruption and lack of ethical actions we are seeing now?

Examples? Here are two in the news recently.

Democrat Gov. Eliot Spitzer

  • Federal money-laundering probe (source: CNN)
  • Allegations of link with illegal prostitution ring (source: CNN)
  • Democrat Gov. Paterson

  • Admits numerous extramarital affairs since 1999 (source: NY Daily News)
  • Democrat Senator Barack Obama

  • Obama continues defending his ties with his pastor’s racial comments (source: CNN)

    Democrat Congressman William Jefferson

  • Grand Jury Indictment in Bribery Investigation (source: ABC
  • Affidavit: $90,000 found in congressman’s freezer (ironic isn’t it) (source: CNN)
  • (Note: This post was first published several days ago, but I felt it needed updated after today’s news of Democrat Gov. Paterson)

    History Favors Republicans for President

    December 29th, 2007 by Scott

    History favors the Republicans for the 2008 Presidential Elections. Why is that, you ask? Looking back at where all the candidates come from, there is a statistical advantage for the Republicans this election year.

    History has favored governors and vice presidents to win the White House. I went back and researched the qualifications and previous “jobs” of all U.S. Presidents since Roosevelt. Take a look at the positions held by our presidents at the time they ran for president:

    Presidents who were Governors while running: 5

  • George Bush: Texas (Republican)
  • Bill Clinton: Arkansas (Democratic)
  • Ronald Reagan: California (Republican)
  • Jimmy Carter: Georgia (Democratic)
  • Franklin Roosevelt: New York (Democratic)

    Presidents who were Vice President while running: 5

  • George H.W. Bush (Republican)
  • Gerald Ford (Republican)
  • Richard Nixon (Republican)
  • Lyndon Johnson (Democratic)
  • Harry Truman (Democratic)

    Presidents who were U.S.Senators while running: 1

  • Jack Kennedy (Democratic)

    Presidents who were Army Chief while running: 1

  • Eisenhower (Republican)

    So as you can see, 10 of the past 12 presidents were either a governor or vice president as they ran for the presidency. Only 1 was a senator. Plus, look at how each election panned out (in reverse chronological order):

    2004 - Bush (Gov) v. Kerry (Senator)
    2000 - Bush (Gov) v. Gore (VP)
    1996 - Clinton (Gov) v. Dole (Senator)
    1992 - Clinton (Gov) v. Bush (Pres)
    1988 - Bush (VP) v. Dukakis (Gov)
    1984 - Reagan (Gov) v. Mondale (former VP)
    1980 - Reagan (Gov) v. Carter (Pres)
    1976 - Carter (Gov) v. Ford (VP)
    1972 - Nixon (former VP) v. McGovern (Senator)
    1968 - Johnson (VP) v. Goldwater (Senator)

    That really drives home how each election tends to favor a Governor. Now lets look at the current batch of top candidates.

    Democrats
    Mrs. Bill Clinton (Hillary Clinton), Obama, Edwards, Biden and Dodd are all Senators. The only governor is Bill Richardson, who is polling so low as to be out of the race. So statistically, they’ve got a pretty slim chance, based on past job experience.

    Republicans
    Giuliani’s last job was as Mayor of New York. This could almost swing as Governor due to the responsibilities he had. But I’m going to keep him in the “maybe” column.
    Romney and Huckabee are both governors (Massachusetts and Arkansas, respectively) and both are polling pretty high right now.
    The rest (McCain, Thompson, Paul and Hunter are either Senators or Congressmen).

    So as we move into the final days leading up to the first primaries, we can see that historically, the Republicans will more than likely nominate Romney, Guiliani or Huckabee. The Democrats will more than likely nominate Mrs. Bill Clinton or Obama.

    This would lead to a Democratic senator against a Republican governor. Which, statistically, means the Republicans have a better chance at the White House.

    Why do the numbers work out the way they do? I believe that as a governor, they faced challenges and working situations that were essentially a “mini” federal government. They oversaw a two party House and Senate their respective states. They made the main decisions for the states. There are many other reasons as well.

    Senators, on the other hand, could be seen as the bureaucracy that is our government. They add the earmark, pork spending.

    My bet: Mitt Romney wins Iowa. Then New Hampshire. He wins the nomination and then the White House.

    UPDATE: 8 Jan 08
    The New Hampshire primary has wrapped and Gov. Romney took the “silver” as he called it. This, combined with the Iowa and Wyoming results, give him the most delegates at this point in time.
    Current standing: Gov. Romney at the top with 29 delegates, Gov. Huckabee in second place with 20, Sen. McCain with 9 delegates.

  • I Told You So! 2007 Was a Good Year!

    December 26th, 2007 by Scott

    In a Washington Times article published today, Lawrence Kudlow hits some of the highlights of President Bush’s 2007 accomplishments. Kudlow is right on the mark in many areas. Allow me to expand with the Democratic/Republican “2007 predictions.”

    After all, hindsight is 20/20.

    The Economy

    Democratic Prediction: 2007 Recession

    The Huffington Post: Sep 10, 2007 - Strained by an ailing housing market and credit woes, the economy in 2007 is expected to log its worst growth in five years and should be somewhat sluggish next year. The No. 1 risk, though, is that the economy will lose its footing altogether and fall into a recession, forecasters say.

    The New York Times: September 8, 2007 - Suddenly, analysts are talking about a possible recession. And that’s not good news for anybody. A few more months like August would make a recession likely.

    ABC: Democrat Chris Dodd Predicts Recession: November 11, 2007 - Senate Banking Committee Chairman Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., predicted this morning that the country is headed into a recession. “Well, it’s certainly pointing in that direction. We hope that’s not the case, but there are many people who watch this minute to minute and would have drawn that conclusion. Some are even predicting a far greater likelihood than I would at this juncture,” Dodd said in a “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” interview.

    Actual Outcome: 2007 Sees Record Economic Growth
    (Source: Federal Fact Sheet: December 12, 2007)

    • November 2007 Marks Record 51st Consecutive Month of Job Growth
    • More Than 8.3 Million Jobs Created Since August 2003 In Longest Continuous Run Of Job Growth On Record
    • 94,000 jobs created in November.
    • GDP grew at 4.9 percent annual rate in the third quarter of 2007 (six years of uninterrupted growth, averaging 2.8 percent a year since 2001)

    Iraq Troop Surge

    Democratic Prediction: Troop Surge Will Fail

    Democrat Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader (in The Huffington Post) December 19, 2006 - Frankly, I don’t believe that more troops is the answer for Iraq.

    Arianna Huffington (in the Huffington Post) June 14, 2007 - The Democrats need to stick with Reid’s plan to ratchet up the pressure on the president — and especially on Congressional Republicans who will have to face the wrath of voters in 2008. It is the right thing to do — both on moral grounds and on political grounds.

    Stephen Schlesinger April 19, 2007 - This, after several months of the so-called Bush “surge”, which was going to decisively change the direction of the war in Iraq. The surge is a disaster.

    ‘Surge’ Strategy Is Recipe For Disaster - John Nichols, CBS December 20, 2006 - The “surge” strategy is ridiculous on its face. Strategists in Washington should be developing a plan for U.S. troops to surge homeward, not pushing a scheme to send more young men and women into a hopeless —and deadly — quagmire.

    Actual Outcome: Troop Surge Worked

    The Washington Times: August 21, 2007 - Top Senate Democrats have started to acknowledge progress in Iraq, with the chairman of the Armed Services Committee yesterday saying the U.S. troop surge is producing “measurable results.”

    Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan highlighted improved security in Baghdad and al Qaeda losses in Anbar province as examples of success — a shift for Democrats who have mainly discounted or ignored advances on the battlefield for weeks.

    “The military aspects of President Bush’s new strategy in Iraq … appear to have produced some credible and positive results,” Mr. Levin said in a joint statement with Sen. John W. Warner, Virginia Republican, after a two-day visit last week to Iraq.

    Facts from MIT: September 14, 2007 - … civilian fatalities have declined without any concurrent increase in casualties among coalition and Iraqi troops.

    General Petraeus: Iraq troop surge is working (UK Telegraph) December 9, 2007 - America’s military commander in Iraq gave President George W Bush a major boost last night by telling the US Congress that his “surge” policy was working and troop levels should be reduced by 30,000 over the next 10 months.

    Iraq says most of Al-Qaeda network destroyed in 2007 - The Iraqi interior ministry lauded its achievements over the past year on Saturday, saying that 75 percent of Al-Qaeda’s networks in the country had been destroyed in 12 months.
    Ministry spokesman Abdul Karim Khalaf also outlined sharp falls in the numbers of assassinations, kidnappings and death squad murders. Breitbart, Dec. 29, 2007

    What’s Ahead in 2008?
    I even see the trends pointing to a better 2008. With Congress’ dismal approval ratings, I even predict that we’ll see a return to a Republican controlled House and Senate in November 2008 and continue to hold the White House.

    I will continue to document why I feel the Republicans will win all three branches as I follow the course of the primaries and the election year events. But there is one underlying theme that you’ll see and you can see in the above analysis.

    Democrats like to lower the bar and tell us how much things will go wrong. Republicans like to look forward and find ways to raise the bar.

    After all, look at the predictions above. Even with a Democratic controlled House and Senate, the Democrats had to shout doom and gloom. “We’re going to have a recession! We’re losing in Iraq!”

    Why? Because anything that is good for the country is bad for them. Success for the country means that the Bush Doctrine is working. It means the tax cuts worked. It means the troop surge worked.

    Stay tuned!

    Next Entries »